A tale of two cities

The contrast could hardly have been starker.
Here we had the outgoing mayor,
Mike Moncrief, and City Councilman Joel Burns, at a ceremony this morning officially opening Fort Worth’s network of urban bicycle lanes, talking about such things as smart growth, improving the environment, fostering healthful habits and easing congestion by getting more bicycles onto the city’s streets and roads.

Cyclists gather for ribbon-cutting ceremony in downtown Fort Worth

But in the adjacent city of Arlingon on Tuesday night, at a City Council hearing on a biking and hiking plan for that city, bicycles were depicted by a vocal, organized group of critics as tools of tyranny, and bicycle lanes as part of a sinister socialist plot to force Americans to give up their cars, adopt two-wheeled transport and move from the suburbs into high-density, crime-ridden central cities.
And besides, they said, bike lanes will decrease property values. (See June 29 blog post, “A parallel universe in a city next-door.”)
Arlington’s Hike and Bike System Master Plan, a sharply scaled-back version of the original proposal, was approved by the City Council on 5-4 vote. For final passage, the plan requires a second reading before the council and a final vote, expected to be on Aug. 2.
Councilman Mel LeBlanc spoke for the council opposition, and Mayor

City Councilman Joel Burns, left, and outgoing Mayor Mike Moncrief cut a ribbon to officially open Fort Worth's downtown bicycle lanes

Robert Cluck, apparently feeling the heat of the vocal critics, voted against the plan.
“The city of the future is not the city that puts bike paths in,” LeBlanc said. “It’s the city … that has a very low tax rate and a very low debt ratio. The city of the future is the city you can move to and not be robbed by taxes.”
Tell that, for example, to Minneapolis, or Portland, Ore., or Boulder, Colo. — or Fort Worth. All of those cities are considered very desirable places to live. (Just last week, Fort Worth was designated for the third time since 1964 as an “All-America City” by the National Civic League meeting in Kansas City.)
And all of those cities have taken aggressive steps to encourage people to ride bicycles — not as part of a United Nations conspiracy, but for such common-sense reasons as easing congestion, reducing environmental pollution and promoting health.
In contrast to the pain and angst in Arlington over installing a few bike lanes, Fort Worth’s City Council unanimously approved on Feb. 8, 2010, a “comprehensive bicycle transportation plan.” Bike Fort Worth aims to increase the number of bicycle trails, on-street lanes and signed bike routes from about 100 miles to nearly 1,000 miles over several decades.
The plan also proposes to sharply increase the number of bike commuters and “attain official designation as a Bicycle Friendly Community through the League of American Bicyclists” by 2015.

A bronze statue of Mark Twain along Fort Worth's Trinity Trails network

The city has been quickly implementing the plan. Bicycle lanes and racks have been installed on Magnolia Avenue, a bustling thoroughfare of restaurants, shops and watering holes on the city’s Near South Side; along major streets into and around downtown; along West Seventh Street from downtown to a thriving district of museums, restaurants and bars that some have dubbed “little Dallas”; and around Texas Christian University.
The urban bike lanes are designed to connect with the city’s excellent network of paved trails, mostly along the Clear and West forks of the Trinity River.
At this morning’s ribbon-cutting ceremony for the downtown lanes, Councilman Burns, a Realtor whose District 9 includes downtown and the Near South Side, spoke of the economic benefits of bike lanes.
“Studies have shown that bike lanes are not only good for our health and the environment, but they’re also good for the health of the economy,” Burns said, noting that bicycle lanes promote tourism, drive traffic to local businesses and increase property values.
“Neighborhoods become more desirable when traffic slows down and residents have more transportation choices,” he said.
Are you listening, Arlington Realtors!
So which is the city of the future? Mel LeBlanc’s Arlington, where many residents seem to be mired in the 1950s? Or Joel Burns’ Fort Worth?
I’d put my money on Fort Worth.

For a full report on the ribbon-cutting ceremony check out the video below, shot by Kevin Buchanan for his Fort Worthology blog.

Fort Worth Bike Lane Ribbon Cutting Ceremony from Kevin Buchanan on Vimeo.



Filed under Americana, Environment, Politics, Texana, Urban cycling

3 responses to “A tale of two cities

  1. infogoddess

    Well stated, Jim.

  2. Martha Jones

    What a great ceremony but there was very little communication with the bike clubs. No one I talked to in FWBA knew about it or there would have been a TON more cyclists there !!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s